[PATCH 3.16 172/254] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans_queue

[Ben Hutchings]

3.16.55-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>

commit d16b46e4fd8bc6063624605f25b8c0835bb1fbe3 upstream.

We do not need locking in xfrm_trans_queue because it is designed
to use per-CPU buffers.  However, the original code incorrectly
used skb_queue_tail which takes the lock.  This patch switches
it to __skb_queue_tail instead.

Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asav...@redhat.com>
Fixes: acf568ee859f ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets...")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb
                return -ENOBUFS;
 
        XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
-       skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
+       __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
        tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
        return 0;
 }