[PATCH 3.2 099/140] cfg80211: check dev_set_name() return value

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2.100-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>

commit 59b179b48ce2a6076448a44531242ac2b3f6cef2 upstream.

syzbot reported a warning from rfkill_alloc(), and after a while
I think that the reason is that it was doing fault injection and
the dev_set_name() failed, leaving the name NULL, and we didn't
check the return value and got to rfkill_alloc() with a NULL name.
Since we really don't want a NULL name, we ought to check the
return value.

Fixes: fb28ad35906a ("net: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), 
dev_set_name()")
Reported-by: syzbot+1ddfb3357e1d7bb5b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ struct wiphy *wiphy_new(const struct cfg
 
        struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev;
        int alloc_size;
+       int rv;
 
        WARN_ON(ops->add_key && (!ops->del_key || !ops->set_default_key));
        WARN_ON(ops->auth && (!ops->assoc || !ops->deauth || !ops->disassoc));
@@ -362,7 +363,11 @@ struct wiphy *wiphy_new(const struct cfg
        mutex_unlock(&cfg80211_mutex);
 
        /* give it a proper name */
-       dev_set_name(&rdev->wiphy.dev, PHY_NAME "%d", rdev->wiphy_idx);
+       rv = dev_set_name(&rdev->wiphy.dev, PHY_NAME "%d", rdev->wiphy_idx);
+       if (rv < 0) {
+               kfree(rdev);
+               return NULL;
+       }
 
        mutex_init(&rdev->mtx);
        mutex_init(&rdev->devlist_mtx);