On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Extended TrustZone Protection driver is very basic and only needs
> to know where are the registers (no clock, no interrupt)
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32mp1-etzpc.txt | 25
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32mp1-etzpc.txt
>
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32mp1-etzpc.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32mp1-etzpc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9407e37f7d15
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32mp1-etzpc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +STMicroelectronics STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection driver
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : value should be "st,stm32mp1-etzpc"
> + - reg : physical base address of the IP registers and length of memory
> + mapped region.
> + - protected-devices: list of phandle of devices protected by etzpc.
> + Because etzpc driver rely on the phandle index in
> + the list, holes must be filled with a disabled node.
... where the index corresponds to what, exactly?
Padding with a disabled node seems very hacky.
Thanks,
Mark.
> +
> +Example for stm32mp1:
> +
> +reserved: disabled_node {
> + status = "disabled";
> +};
> +
> +etzpc: etzpc@5c007000 {
> + compatible = "st,stm32mp1-etzpc";
> + reg = <0x5c007000 0x400>;
> + protected-devices = <&usart1>,
> + <&spi6>,
> + <&i2c4>,
> + <&reserved>,
> + <&rng1>;
> +};
> --
> 2.15.0
>
