On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 11:38:03AM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote: > This is the equivalent of commit 001bf455d206 ("ARM: 8428/1: kgdb: Fix > registers on sleeping tasks") but for arm64. Nuff said.
It's a pity that 001bf455d206 doesn't explain *why* past_pt_regs doesn't work. Anyway, does this mean you're actually using kgdb on arm64? Does the rest of it appear to work? Will > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c > index 2122cd187f19..01285d4dcdc3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c > @@ -138,14 +138,26 @@ int dbg_set_reg(int regno, void *mem, struct pt_regs > *regs) > void > sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct > *task) > { > - struct pt_regs *thread_regs; > + struct thread_struct *thread = &task->thread; > + struct cpu_context *cpu_context = &thread->cpu_context; > > /* Initialize to zero */ > memset((char *)gdb_regs, 0, NUMREGBYTES); > - thread_regs = task_pt_regs(task); > - memcpy((void *)gdb_regs, (void *)thread_regs->regs, GP_REG_BYTES); > - /* Special case for PSTATE (check comments in asm/kgdb.h for details) */ > - dbg_get_reg(33, gdb_regs + GP_REG_BYTES, thread_regs); > + > + gdb_regs[19] = cpu_context->x19; > + gdb_regs[20] = cpu_context->x20; > + gdb_regs[21] = cpu_context->x21; > + gdb_regs[22] = cpu_context->x22; > + gdb_regs[23] = cpu_context->x23; > + gdb_regs[24] = cpu_context->x24; > + gdb_regs[25] = cpu_context->x25; > + gdb_regs[26] = cpu_context->x26; > + gdb_regs[27] = cpu_context->x27; > + gdb_regs[28] = cpu_context->x28; > + gdb_regs[29] = cpu_context->fp; > + > + gdb_regs[31] = cpu_context->sp; > + gdb_regs[32] = cpu_context->pc; > } > > void kgdb_arch_set_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc) > -- > 2.16.2.395.g2e18187dfd-goog >