From: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
[ Upstream commit cf25ae78fc50010f66b9be945017796da34c434d ]
Since nr_queued is changed, we need to call wake_up here
if the array is already frozen and waiting for condition
"nr_pending == nr_queued + extra" to be true.
And commit 824e47daddbf ("RAID1: avoid unnecessary spin
locks in I/O barrier code") which has already added the
wake_up for raid1.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index b19b551bb34b..b1daff78f7b2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2704,6 +2704,11 @@ static void handle_write_completed(struct r10conf *conf,
struct r10bio *r10_bio)
list_add(&r10_bio->retry_list, &conf->bio_end_io_list);
conf->nr_queued++;
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
+ /*
+ * In case freeze_array() is waiting for condition
+ * nr_pending == nr_queued + extra to be true.
+ */
+ wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
} else {
if (test_bit(R10BIO_WriteError,
--
2.14.1
