On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:33:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On 15.01.2018 13:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks > >> as critical. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]> > >> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> > >> Change log: > >> v2: Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and > >> Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on > >> Tegra20 > >> and Tegra30. > >> > >> v3: Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are > >> not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer > >> about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks. > >> Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers. > > > > Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? > > My > > T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. > > Things > > happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary > > bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are > > broken, > > although would be nice to have one problem less. > > Guys, is there anything I could do to get these patches in linux-next?
I've picked these up into the for-4.17/clk branch in the Tegra tree. I already have that branch for the MBIST patches which are a dependency for the for-4.17/soc branch. Stephen, Mike, let me know if you have any objections to carrying these in the Tegra tree. Thanks, Thierry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
