On Tue, 29 May 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> CONFIG_MIGRATION currently depends on CONFIG_NUMA. move_pages() is the only
> user of migration today and as this system call is only meaningful on NUMA,
> it makes sense. However, memory compaction will operate within a zone and is
> useful on both NUMA and non-NUMA systems. This patch allows CONFIG_MIGRATION
> to be used in all memory models. To preserve existing behaviour, move_pages()
> is only available when CONFIG_NUMA is set.

Hmmm... I thought I had this already set up so that it would be easy to 
switch page migration to not depend on CONFIG_NUMA. Not so it seems.

> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/migrate.h        
> 2007-05-28 14:11:32.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/migrate.h        
> 2007-05-29 10:00:09.000000000 +0100
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>  
>  typedef struct page *new_page_t(struct page *, unsigned long private, int 
> **);
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES
>  /* Check if a vma is migratable */
>  static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
> @@ -24,7 +24,14 @@ static inline int vma_migratable(struct 
>                       return 0;
>       return 1;
>  }
> +#else
> +static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif

I guess we get compilation failures because of the reference to 
policy_zone here for the !NUMA case? I think vma migratable is not used at 
all if !NUMA.


> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>  extern int isolate_lru_page(struct page *p, struct list_head *pagelist);
>  extern int putback_lru_pages(struct list_head *l);
>  extern int migrate_page(struct address_space *,
> @@ -40,8 +47,6 @@ extern int migrate_vmas(struct mm_struct
>               const nodemask_t *from, const nodemask_t *to,
>               unsigned long flags);
>  #else
> -static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> -                                     { return 0; }

Maybe this block is not necessary?

> diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff 
> linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/mm.h 
> linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/mm.h
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/mm.h     
> 2007-05-24 10:13:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/mm.h     
> 2007-05-28 14:13:44.000000000 +0100
> @@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ struct vm_operations_struct {
>       int (*set_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mempolicy *new);
>       struct mempolicy *(*get_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                                       unsigned long addr);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>       int (*migrate)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, const nodemask_t *from,
>               const nodemask_t *to, unsigned long flags);
>  #endif

Correct.

> diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff 
> linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/mm/Kconfig 
> linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/mm/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/mm/Kconfig     2007-05-24 
> 10:13:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/mm/Kconfig     2007-05-29 
> 09:57:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -145,13 +145,16 @@ config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
>  config MIGRATION
>       bool "Page migration"
>       def_bool y
> -     depends on NUMA
>       help
>         Allows the migration of the physical location of pages of processes
>         while the virtual addresses are not changed. This is useful for
>         example on NUMA systems to put pages nearer to the processors 
> accessing
>         the page.
>  
> +config SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES
> +     def_bool y
> +     depends on MIGRATION && NUMA
> +

Do we really need the CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES? I think you will directly 
access the lower levels. So why have it? CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES == 
CONFIG_NUMA.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to