On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:14 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > > > >> Dave, > >> > >> Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup, > >> The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours, > >> so I am fairly sure the patch did correct the original lockup, or > >> at the very least make it a lot less likely. > >> > >> I hit the machine across NFS for 5 days before it deadlocked, before > >> the patch I could only get an hour or two (2-4 different tries). > >> > >> Given that pdflush is "D" it does not appear to be an NFS issue. > >> > >> Included is the sysrq-t. > >> > >> This is with 2.6.21.1 + the JFSIO patch. > > > > Is the system still in this state? Can you cat /proc/fs/jfs/TxAnchor > > (if CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is defined) and /proc/fs/jfs/txstats (if > > CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS is defined)? > > > > Thanks, > > Shaggy > > Yes, the machine is still in that state. > > Apparently I don't have either of those configured. > > Anything else that we can collect before I rebuild the kernel with > those options setup?
No. I think I may have found something to explain the hang. I need to look a bit closer. Go ahead and rebuild the kernel with those options in case I'm mistaken. Thanks, Shaggy > > Roger > -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
