Hi,
I made two other submissions that may also have been overlooked:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211401/ -- This one has the S-o-B
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211473/ -- RFC, was looking for comments,
has the S-o-B
For https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211483/, I'm not sure how to go about
doing a reply to all.
I had some email problems and was cut-off from the list for a while.
MV
On 03/09/18 13:24, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:07:20PM -0600, Kim Phillips escreveu:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:06:27 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
Em Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:10:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips escreveu:
Based on prior work:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/6/395
Thanks, looks good, applying.
Jean, is everything ok with you on this?
By now your email to Jean should have bounced with "The email account
that you tried to reach does not exist." Removing Jean from Cc.
It seems like you're applying patches. There are a couple that have
slipped through the cracks: Can you please take a look at applying them?
- "perf tools: Fixing uninitialised variable"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10179381/
[acme@jouet perf]$ git tag --contains d2785de15f1bd42d613d56bbac5a007e7293b874
perf-core-for-mingo-4.17-20180216
commit d2785de15f1bd42d613d56bbac5a007e7293b874
Author: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon Feb 12 13:32:37 2018 -0700
Commit: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Fri Feb 16 14:55:40 2018 -0300
perf auxtrace arm: Fixing uninitialised variable
When working natively on arm64 the compiler gets pesky and complains
that variable 'i' is uninitialised, something that breaks the
compilation. Here no further checks are needed since variable
'found_spe' can only be true if variable 'i' has been initialised as
part of the for loop.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jin Yao <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
index 2323581b157d..fa639e3e52ac 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct auxtrace_record
bool found_spe = false;
static struct perf_pmu **arm_spe_pmus = NULL;
static int nr_spes = 0;
- int i;
+ int i = 0;
- "perf unwind: Report error from dwfl_attach_state"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211483/
[Martin, I guess it would help if you replied-all that patch and
added your signed-off-by.]
Right, the S-o-B is needed
- "perf unwind: Unwind with libdw doesn't take symfs into account"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211599/
This one has the S-o-B, applying, Jiri, holler if you disagree,
- Arnaldo
Thanks,
Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
