On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:56:01 +0200 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When a cpu is disabled, move_task_off_dead_cpu() is called for tasks > > > that have been running on that cpu. > > > > So I still have these three patches in the pending queue but I was > > rather hoping that the scheduler, sched-domains and cpuset people > > could take a look at them, please. > > > > They hit sched.c and cpuset.c mainly, and they might trash Ingo's CFS > > patch (I haven't checked). > > The patch looks good to me. It applies cleanly ontop of CFS and it > builds and boots fine with and without CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG (although i > havent tried to explicitly stress the codepath in question). We are a > bit paranoid in this codepath but it's not performance-critical > normally. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I applied this to -mm, thanks. The other two patches don't apply well to the current pending patch queue and nobody seems keen on doing a serious review (or any review, iirc), so I ducked them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
