On Sat,  3 Mar 2018 20:49:36 -0500
Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org> wrote:

> Not all errors that occurred in tsl2x7x_get_prox() were correctly
> reported in the return value. This patch changes the error handling
> so that errors are now returned properly.
> 
> Note that the ret variable is from the call to tsl2x7x_read_status(),
> and it already has the correct error check. The -EINVAL error code is
> for an unexpected value in the register.
> 
> This patch also corrects an unnecessary word wrap in the call to
> le16_to_cpup() while changes are being made to this code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org>
Good cleanup.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to work their magic.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c 
> b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> index 5c611250127f..cc209b64ed5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> @@ -489,16 +489,20 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_prox(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>       case tmd2671:
>       case tsl2771:
>       case tmd2771:
> -             if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_ADC_VALID))
> +             if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_ADC_VALID)) {
> +                     ret = -EINVAL;
>                       goto prox_poll_err;
> +             }
>               break;
>       case tsl2572:
>       case tsl2672:
>       case tmd2672:
>       case tsl2772:
>       case tmd2772:
> -             if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_PRX_VALID))
> +             if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_PRX_VALID)) {
> +                     ret = -EINVAL;
>                       goto prox_poll_err;
> +             }
>               break;
>       }
>  
> @@ -512,14 +516,13 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_prox(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>               chdata[i] = ret;
>       }
>  
> -     chip->prox_data =
> -                     le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&chdata[0]);
> +     chip->prox_data = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&chdata[0]);
> +     ret = chip->prox_data;
>  
>  prox_poll_err:
> -
>       mutex_unlock(&chip->prox_mutex);
>  
> -     return chip->prox_data;
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /**

Reply via email to