[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > no, this won't help you much against local users, [...]
Pavel Machek wrote: >Hmm, I guess I'd love "it is useless on multiuser boxes" to become >standard part of AA advertising. That's not quite what david@ said. As I understand it, AppArmor is not focused on preventing attacks by local users against other local users; that's not the main problem it is trying to solve. Rather, it's primary purpose is to deal with attacks by remote bad guys against your network servers. That is a laudable goal. Anything that helps reduce the impact of remote exploits is bound to be useful, even if doesn't do a darn thing to stop local users from attacking each other. This means that AppArmor could still be useful on multiuser boxes, even if that utility is limited to defending (some) network daemons against remote attack (or, more precisely, reducing the damage done by a successful remote attack against a network daemon). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
