Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com> writes:

> A user can write arbitrary integer values to msgmni and shmmni sysctl
> parameters without getting error, but the actual limit is really
> IPCMNI (32k). This can mislead users as they think they can get a
> value that is not real.
>
> Enforcing the limit by failing the sysctl parameter write, however,
> can break existing user applications.

Which applications examples please.

I am seeing this patchset late but it looks like a whole lot of changes
to avoid a theoretical possibility.

Changes that have an impact on more than just the ipc code you are
patching.

That makes me feel very uncomfortable with these changes.

Eric


> Instead, the range clamping flag
> is set to enforce the limit without failing existing user code. Users
> can easily figure out if the sysctl parameter value is out of range
> by either reading back the parameter value or checking the kernel
> ring buffer for warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  ipc/ipc_sysctl.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c b/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c
> index 8ad93c2..1955dd4 100644
> --- a/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c
> +++ b/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int proc_ipc_auto_msgmni(struct ctl_table *table, 
> int write,
>  static int zero;
>  static int one = 1;
>  static int int_max = INT_MAX;
> +static int ipc_mni = IPCMNI;
>  
>  static struct ctl_table ipc_kern_table[] = {
>       {
> @@ -120,7 +121,10 @@ static int proc_ipc_auto_msgmni(struct ctl_table *table, 
> int write,
>               .data           = &init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlmni,
>               .maxlen         = sizeof(init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlmni),
>               .mode           = 0644,
> -             .proc_handler   = proc_ipc_dointvec,
> +             .proc_handler   = proc_ipc_dointvec_minmax,
> +             .extra1         = &zero,
> +             .extra2         = &ipc_mni,
> +             .flags          = CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE,
>       },
>       {
>               .procname       = "shm_rmid_forced",
> @@ -147,7 +151,8 @@ static int proc_ipc_auto_msgmni(struct ctl_table *table, 
> int write,
>               .mode           = 0644,
>               .proc_handler   = proc_ipc_dointvec_minmax,
>               .extra1         = &zero,
> -             .extra2         = &int_max,
> +             .extra2         = &ipc_mni,
> +             .flags          = CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE,
>       },
>       {
>               .procname       = "auto_msgmni",

Reply via email to