On 13-03-18, 12:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular > thermal framework: > > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready': > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to > `of_cpufreq_cooling_register' > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit': > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to > `cpufreq_cooling_unregister' > > This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration > is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work. > Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the > THERMAL dependency. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > index 9bbb5b39d18a..d9457d1e535c 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ > config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ > tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver" > depends on ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL && COMMON_CLK_SCPI > + depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL > help > This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCPI > protocol for CPU power management.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> -- viresh
