On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Tautschnig, Michael wrote:
> 
> > All definitions of syscalls in x86 except for those patched here have
> > already been using the appropriate SYSCALL_DEFINE*.
> 
> Dominik, do you have more urgent stuff queued in that area?
> 
> If yes, please add: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> 
> If not, I simply route it through x86/urgent for 4.16.

Thanks for asking! Nothing urgent from my side, only stuff for 4.17, so it
would be great if you could route it through x86/urgent.

Thanks,
        Dominik

Reply via email to