On 15.03.2018 01:56, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: >> This can be done if this function is modified to return only the CPU >> equivalence table length (without the container header length), leaving >> its single caller the job of adding the container header length to skip >> to the fist patch section. > > Sure, it leaves the function to deal with the equiv table length only > and the caller then adds the header length. Which is actually cleaner. >
OK, will do then. Maciej
