On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:58 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (03/14/18 15:09), Petr Mladek wrote:
> 


> >  char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
> >           struct printf_spec spec)
> >  {
> > +   static const char data_access_fmt[] =
> > "RrhbMmIiEUVNadCDgGO";
> >     const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(void *);
> > +   const char *err_msg = NULL;
> > +
> > +   /* Prevent silent crash when this is called under
> > logbuf_lock. */
> > +   if (*fmt && strchr(data_access_fmt, *fmt) != NULL)
> > +           err_msg = check_pointer_access(ptr);
> 
> Agree with Rasmus, I think switch() is easier.
> 

One more to the same.

Though need to add that we also have to append / update some comment to
keep these lists synchronized (in Documentation, around pointer() and
here)

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Reply via email to