On Thu 15-03-18 19:56:06, Jia He wrote:
> This reverts commit 379b03b7fa05f7db521b7732a52692448a3c34fe.
> 
> Commit 864b75f9d6b0 ("mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock
> alignment") introduced boot hang issues in arm/arm64 machines, so
> Ard Biesheuvel reverted in commit 3e04040df6d4. But there is a
> preparation patch for commit 864b75f9d6b0. So just revert it for
> the sake of caution.

Why? Is there anything wrong with this one?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia...@hxt-semitech.com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index b6ba6b7..5a9ca2a 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ unsigned long __init_memblock 
> memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
>       struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
>       unsigned int right = type->cnt;
>       unsigned int mid, left = 0;
> -     phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn);
> +     phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + 1);
>  
>       do {
>               mid = (right + left) / 2;
> @@ -1118,15 +1118,15 @@ unsigned long __init_memblock 
> memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
>                                 type->regions[mid].size))
>                       left = mid + 1;
>               else {
> -                     /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */
> -                     return pfn;
> +                     /* addr is within the region, so pfn + 1 is valid */
> +                     return min(pfn + 1, max_pfn);
>               }
>       } while (left < right);
>  
>       if (right == type->cnt)
> -             return -1UL;
> +             return max_pfn;
>       else
> -             return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base);
> +             return min(PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base), max_pfn);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to