What was the verdict here? Were you satisfied with this or do you need a change?
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Whatever. I think you can work it out ;)
>>
>>
>
> Bare with me, I just woke up ;)
>
>> while (driver_probe_done() || (ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(...)) == 0)
>>
>> perhaps?
>>
>> The loop-which-sleeps within a loop-which-sleeps seems poorly thought out?
>>
>
> I'd say a matter of taste. I'm not a big fan och cramming things into
> the while() clause.
>
> The idea with the double loops was to keep this thread asleep when we
> could detect meaningful work elsewhere in the kernel. You could just
> remove the inner-most loop if it offends you. :)
>
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
