4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>

commit a14bff131108faf50cc0cf864589fd71ee216c96 upstream.

In the following commit:

  9e0e3c5130e9 ("x86/speculation, objtool: Annotate indirect calls/jumps for 
objtool")

... we added annotations for CALL_NOSPEC/JMP_NOSPEC on 64-bit x86 kernels,
but we did not annotate the 32-bit path.

Annotate it similarly.

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -183,7 +183,10 @@
  * otherwise we'll run out of registers. We don't care about CET
  * here, anyway.
  */
-# define CALL_NOSPEC ALTERNATIVE("call *%[thunk_target]\n",    \
+# define CALL_NOSPEC                                           \
+       ALTERNATIVE(                                            \
+       ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE                                 \
+       "call *%[thunk_target]\n",                              \
        "       jmp    904f;\n"                                 \
        "       .align 16\n"                                    \
        "901:   call   903f;\n"                                 \


Reply via email to