On Thu, 31 May 2007 19:09:10 PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > + > +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that > +maintainer neither wrote, merged nor forwarded the patch themselves.
Do we want to add verbiage saying that an Acked-By: is also useful when it comes from somebody (likely the original reporter) who has actually tested the patch?
pgpUdMcDDUvOr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
