On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 6:09:54 AM CET Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 13-03-18, 12:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular > > thermal framework: > > > > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready': > > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to > > `of_cpufreq_cooling_register' > > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit': > > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to > > `cpufreq_cooling_unregister' > > > > This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration > > is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work. > > Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the > > THERMAL dependency. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > > index 9bbb5b39d18a..d9457d1e535c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ > > config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ > > tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver" > > depends on ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL && COMMON_CLK_SCPI > > + depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL > > help > > This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCPI > > protocol for CPU power management. > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Applied, thanks!
