Commit-ID:  e97a90f7069b740575bcb1dae86596e0484b8957
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/e97a90f7069b740575bcb1dae86596e0484b8957
Author:     Claudio Scordino <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:35:40 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:48:22 +0100

sched/cpufreq: Rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE

When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization, it
should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise it may miss some deadline.

Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have
shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible
increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape).

Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <[email protected]>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <[email protected]>
Cc: Todd Kjos <[email protected]>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 89fe78ecb88c..2b124811947d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -267,6 +267,16 @@ static bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; 
}
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 
+/*
+ * Make sugov_should_update_freq() ignore the rate limit when DL
+ * has increased the utilization.
+ */
+static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, struct 
sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+       if (cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->util_dl)
+               sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
+}
+
 static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
                                unsigned int flags)
 {
@@ -279,6 +289,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data 
*hook, u64 time,
        sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
        sg_cpu->last_update = time;
 
+       ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy);
+
        if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
                return;
 
@@ -356,6 +368,8 @@ sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 
time, unsigned int flags)
        sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
        sg_cpu->last_update = time;
 
+       ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy);
+
        if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {
                next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time);
                sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);

Reply via email to