Commit-ID: e97a90f7069b740575bcb1dae86596e0484b8957 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e97a90f7069b740575bcb1dae86596e0484b8957 Author: Claudio Scordino <clau...@evidence.eu.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:35:40 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:48:22 +0100
sched/cpufreq: Rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization, it should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise it may miss some deadline. Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape). Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <clau...@evidence.eu.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmus...@arm.com> Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bell...@arm.com> Cc: Todd Kjos <tk...@android.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggem...@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1520937340-2755-1-git-send-email-clau...@evidence.eu.com --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 89fe78ecb88c..2b124811947d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -267,6 +267,16 @@ static bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; } #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */ +/* + * Make sugov_should_update_freq() ignore the rate limit when DL + * has increased the utilization. + */ +static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) +{ + if (cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->util_dl) + sg_policy->need_freq_update = true; +} + static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, unsigned int flags) { @@ -279,6 +289,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); sg_cpu->last_update = time; + ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy); + if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) return; @@ -356,6 +368,8 @@ sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, unsigned int flags) sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); sg_cpu->last_update = time; + ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy); + if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) { next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time); sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
