On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > + sym = sym_lookup("DEVEL_KERNEL", 0); > > > > + sym->type = S_BOOLEAN; > > > > + sym->flags |= SYMBOL_AUTO; > > > > + p = getenv("DEVEL_KERNEL"); > > > > + if (p && atoi(p)) > > > > + sym_add_default(sym, "y"); > > > > + else > > > > + sym_add_default(sym, "n"); > > > > + > > > > > > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, yes); > > > else > > > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, no); > > > > > > should do the trick (untested). > > > > Odd. What's the third state ? Undefined? > no, mod, yes > Representing: no, module, yes as the three config choices.
Now I'm even more puzzled. Why would 'DEVEL_KERNEL' need to be modular ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/