On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:49:51PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > +static int zram_debugfs_register(struct zram *zram)
> > +{
> > +   struct dentry *ret;
> > +
> > +   if (!zram_debugfs_root)
> > +           return -ENOENT;
> 
> No need to care, you should not error out if debugfs is not enabled or
> not working, your code path should be identical either way.  debugfs is
> not required for any functionality, so don't treat it like it matters :)

Glad to hear. It makes code much clean.

> 
> > +   zram->debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(zram->disk->disk_name,
> > +                                           zram_debugfs_root);
> > +   if (!zram->debugfs_dir)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> 
> No need to check the return value of any debugfs call, you can always
> either use it for future debugfs calls, or ignore it.
> 
> > +   ret = debugfs_create_file("access_time", 0400, zram->debugfs_dir,
> > +                           zram, &proc_zram_access_operations);
> > +   if (!ret)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Again, you shouldn't care :)
> 
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> 
> just return void, no need to test any of this.

Thanks for the quick review, Greg.

Reply via email to