On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:08:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2018年3月22日 GMT+08:00 上午1:13:42, "Jernej Škrabec" <jernej.skra...@siol.net> > 写到: > >Hi all, > > > >Dne sreda, 21. marec 2018 ob 03:18:13 CET je Icenowy Zheng napisal(a): > >> 于 2018年3月21日 GMT+08:00 上午2:46:46, Maxime Ripard > ><maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> > >写到: > >> >On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:53:49AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> >> All the sub-blocks of Allwinner A64 DE2 needs the SRAM C on A64 > >SoC > >> > > >> >to > >> > > >> >> be claimed, otherwise the whole DE2 space is inaccessible. > >> >> > >> >> Add a device tree binding of the DE2 part as a sub-bus. > >> > > >> >Where did you get the info that it was a bus? > >> > >> There's no direct evidence, just some guess. > >> > >> The DE2 is a whole part that is just allocated a memory > >> space at the user manual, and the SRAM controls the > >> access to all modules in the DE2. > >> > >> So it might be a bus. > >> > >> Implement it as a bus is a clear representation on A64. > > > >Since there is already syscon for same mmio region, we migh as well use > >it > >when loading ccu-sun8i-de2 driver on A64. > > > >Other options, like SRAM driver or bus driver, might better represent > >HW, but > > I think the device tree should properly represent the HW, > it's a basic requirment. > > >then we would have two DT nodes covering same mmio region, which I > >think is > >not really acceptable. > > It's acceptable, and DE2 is not the only user of SRAM controller so far.
No, it's not acceptable. Don't create overlapping mmio regions in DT. > > VE will also need a SRAM region to be claimed. > > > > >Any suggestions? > > > >BTW, H6 has same design in this regard. > > > >Best regards, > >Jernej > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html