* Jin Yao <yao....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS
> +#ifdef NO_GLIBC
> +#ifdef HAVE_GTK2_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPYTHON
> +#ifdef HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
BTW., it would be nice at this point to fix those 3 outliers that have a
negation
in their library support status macro:
> +#ifdef NO_GLIBC
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPYTHON
... and invert them back to the HAVE_* side of the logic:
> +#ifdef HAVE_GLIBC
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPYTHON
That should make all related code more consistent and more readable.
Thanks,
Ingo
