[CC Dave] On Tue 27-03-18 15:59:04, Li RongQing wrote: > when reclaim memory, shink_slab will take lots of time even if > no memory is reclaimed, since list_lru_count_one called by it > needs to take a spinlock > > try to optimize it by replacing spinlock with RCU in > __list_lru_count_one
Isn't the RCU overkill here? Why cannot we simply do an optimistic lockless check for nr_items? It would be racy but does it actually matter? We should be able to tolerate occasional 0 to non-zero and vice versa transitions AFAICS. > > $dd if=aaa of=bbb bs=1k count=3886080 > $rm -f bbb > $time echo 100000000 >/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes > > Before: 0m0.415s ===> after: 0m0.395s > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongq...@baidu.com> > --- > include/linux/list_lru.h | 2 ++ > mm/list_lru.c | 69 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h > index bb8129a3474d..ae472538038e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h > +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct list_lru_one { > struct list_head list; > /* may become negative during memcg reparenting */ > long nr_items; > + struct rcu_head rcu; > }; > > struct list_lru_memcg { > @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ struct list_lru_node { > struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; > #endif > long nr_items; > + struct rcu_head rcu; > } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > > struct list_lru { > diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c > index fd41e969ede5..4c58ed861729 100644 > --- a/mm/list_lru.c > +++ b/mm/list_lru.c > @@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru > *lru) > static inline struct list_lru_one * > list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru_node *nlru, int idx) > { > - /* > - * The lock protects the array of per cgroup lists from relocation > - * (see memcg_update_list_lru_node). > - */ > - lockdep_assert_held(&nlru->lock); > - if (nlru->memcg_lrus && idx >= 0) > - return nlru->memcg_lrus->lru[idx]; > + struct list_lru_memcg *tmp; > + > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); > + > + tmp = rcu_dereference(nlru->memcg_lrus); > + if (tmp && idx >= 0) > + return rcu_dereference(tmp->lru[idx]); > > return &nlru->lru; > } > @@ -113,14 +113,17 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct > list_head *item) > struct list_lru_one *l; > > spin_lock(&nlru->lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > if (list_empty(item)) { > l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); > list_add_tail(item, &l->list); > l->nr_items++; > nlru->nr_items++; > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > return true; > } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > return false; > } > @@ -133,14 +136,17 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct > list_head *item) > struct list_lru_one *l; > > spin_lock(&nlru->lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > if (!list_empty(item)) { > l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); > list_del_init(item); > l->nr_items--; > nlru->nr_items--; > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > return true; > } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > return false; > } > @@ -166,12 +172,13 @@ static unsigned long __list_lru_count_one(struct > list_lru *lru, > { > struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid]; > struct list_lru_one *l; > - unsigned long count; > + unsigned long count = 0; > > - spin_lock(&nlru->lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, memcg_idx); > - count = l->nr_items; > - spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > + if (l) > + count = l->nr_items; > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > return count; > } > @@ -204,6 +211,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int > memcg_idx, > unsigned long isolated = 0; > > spin_lock(&nlru->lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, memcg_idx); > restart: > list_for_each_safe(item, n, &l->list) { > @@ -250,6 +258,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int > memcg_idx, > } > } > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); > return isolated; > } > @@ -296,9 +305,14 @@ static void __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus, > int begin, int end) > { > int i; > + struct list_lru_one *tmp; > > - for (i = begin; i < end; i++) > - kfree(memcg_lrus->lru[i]); > + for (i = begin; i < end; i++) { > + tmp = memcg_lrus->lru[i]; > + rcu_assign_pointer(memcg_lrus->lru[i], NULL); > + if (tmp) > + kfree_rcu(tmp, rcu); > + } > } > > static int __memcg_init_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus, > @@ -314,7 +328,7 @@ static int __memcg_init_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus, > goto fail; > > init_one_lru(l); > - memcg_lrus->lru[i] = l; > + rcu_assign_pointer(memcg_lrus->lru[i], l); > } > return 0; > fail: > @@ -325,25 +339,37 @@ static int __memcg_init_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus, > static int memcg_init_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) > { > int size = memcg_nr_cache_ids; > + struct list_lru_memcg *tmp; > > - nlru->memcg_lrus = kvmalloc(size * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!nlru->memcg_lrus) > + tmp = kvmalloc(size * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!tmp) > return -ENOMEM; > > - if (__memcg_init_list_lru_node(nlru->memcg_lrus, 0, size)) { > - kvfree(nlru->memcg_lrus); > + if (__memcg_init_list_lru_node(tmp, 0, size)) { > + kvfree(tmp); > return -ENOMEM; > } > > + rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, tmp); > + > return 0; > } > > -static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) > +static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu) > { > + struct list_lru_node *nlru; > + > + nlru = container_of(rcu, struct list_lru_node, rcu); > + > __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(nlru->memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); > kvfree(nlru->memcg_lrus); > } > > +static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) > +{ > + call_rcu(&nlru->rcu, memcg_destroy_list_lru_node_rcu); > +} > + > static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, > int old_size, int new_size) > { > @@ -371,9 +397,10 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_node *nlru, > * we have to use IRQ-safe primitives here to avoid deadlock. > */ > spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock); > - nlru->memcg_lrus = new; > + rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); > spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); > > + synchronize_rcu(); > kvfree(old); > return 0; > } > @@ -487,6 +514,7 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_node *nlru, > * we have to use IRQ-safe primitives here to avoid deadlock. > */ > spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > > src = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, src_idx); > dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, dst_idx); > @@ -495,6 +523,7 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_node *nlru, > dst->nr_items += src->nr_items; > src->nr_items = 0; > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); > } > > -- > 2.11.0 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs