On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:38:29 PDT (-0700), t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:27:36 PDT (-0700), t...@linutronix.de wrote:
>
> The commits in tip right now are:
>
> cc6c98485f8e ("RISC-V: Move to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER handler")
> caacdbf4aa56 ("genirq: Add CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
>
> I surely can revert them, but I don't see how they would break arm or
> anything else.
If GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is set via randconfig then set_handle_irq() is
pulled in from the generic code, which conflicts with the definitions in arm,
arm64, and openrisc. The RISC-V commit depends on the genirq one.
Two ways to fix that:
- Rename set_handle_irq() in tip:irq/core and then convert the rest of the
tree over. A few more files touched, but nothing harmful
- Make GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER depend on !IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER. That should
cure it as well
I have a patch set that does the second one, but it's done in a manner that
assumes the partial patch set got merged. Let me just send it out...
