On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:29:35PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> This becomes much neater in Kconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Newly added
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig  | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 7381eeb..0c97f40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ config ARM64
>       select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
> +     select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if GCC_VERSION >= 50000
>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
>       select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
>       select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index b481b4a..7318165 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS       += $(lseinstr) $(brokengasinst)
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS        += $(call cc-option,-mabi=lp64)
>  KBUILD_AFLAGS        += $(call cc-option,-mabi=lp64)
>  
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS        += $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0500, 
> -DCONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128)
> -

If this does what it claims to do, then I agree that it's much cleaner!

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>

Will

Reply via email to