On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:01:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:47:46PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:16:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:27:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > The last user of __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING has been converted to > > > > generic > > > > per-cpu softirq mask. We can now remove this conditional. > > > > > > This seems like half a cleanup; who still has local_softirq_pending() > > > after this? > > > > Only s390 because it uses lowcore to store such cpu data. > > Is it worth keeping it there? It seems an aweful shame to keep this > stuff special cased for just the one arch. At the very least this > should've mentioned s390 is special and why.
Right, I thought well about moving that special case to s390. I can do that in v2. > > And I don't see s390 people on Cc either. Oops, forgot to add them. Thanks.
