Re: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,

[rae l]

On 6/2/07, Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

they should merged into one

this patch I have checked, it's not corrupted, I wonder someone can
give some comment on this?

Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/core/dst.c |   17 ++++-------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c
index 764bccb..c6a0587 100644
--- a/net/core/dst.c
+++ b/net/core/dst.c
@@ -111,13 +111,7 @@ out:
        spin_unlock(&dst_lock);
 }

-static int dst_discard_in(struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-       kfree_skb(skb);
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static int dst_discard_out(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int dst_discard(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
        kfree_skb(skb);
        return 0;
@@ -138,8 +132,7 @@ void * dst_alloc(struct dst_ops * ops)
        dst->ops = ops;
        dst->lastuse = jiffies;
        dst->path = dst;
-       dst->input = dst_discard_in;
-       dst->output = dst_discard_out;
+       dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
 #if RT_CACHE_DEBUG >= 2
        atomic_inc(&dst_total);
 #endif
@@ -153,8 +146,7 @@ static void ___dst_free(struct dst_entry * dst)
           protocol module is unloaded.
         */
        if (dst->dev == NULL || !(dst->dev->flags&IFF_UP)) {
-               dst->input = dst_discard_in;
-               dst->output = dst_discard_out;
+               dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
        }
        dst->obsolete = 2;
 }
@@ -242,8 +234,7 @@ static inline void dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct 
net_device *dev,
                return;

        if (!unregister) {
-               dst->input = dst_discard_in;
-               dst->output = dst_discard_out;
+               dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
        } else {
                dst->dev = &loopback_dev;
                dev_hold(&loopback_dev);
--
1.4.4.2

--
Denis Cheng
Linux Application Developer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/