On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:06:14 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:57:41 -0700 Scott Preece wrote: > > > On 6/2/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... > > > +The Signed-off-by: tag implies that the signer was involved in the > > > development > > --- > > > > Change "implies" to "indicates" - it's an explicit statement, not an > > implication. > > > > --- > > > +of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. > > > + > > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > > > + > > > +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that > > > +maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch themselves. > > --- > > > > This using plural pronouns for indefinite gender leaves one in vague > > territory, but I think "themself" would be better than "themselves, > > since "maintainer" is singular. > > ugh. :( > not-acked-by: /me > I just deleted it ;) "neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/