Hello,

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:49:25PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Still no use-case... But yes, I forgot this is needed for correctness.
> 
> OK, thanks for your patience. But fyi now I hate this interface even more,
> exactly because I was technically wrong in this discussion ;)

Yeah, we might as well omit it for now and add it later when it's
actually needed.  It's just that given that queue and flush are the
two core interfaces, I didn't want to leave it out, and the current
implementation is the lowest-effort one.  I'd be happy to make it
better if you have good suggestions.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Reply via email to