4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>


[ Upstream commit 17cfe79a65f98abe535261856c5aef14f306dff7 ]

syzkaller found an issue caused by lack of sufficient checks
in l2tp_tunnel_create()

RAW sockets can not be considered as UDP ones for instance.

In another patch, we shall replace all pr_err() by less intrusive
pr_debug() so that syzkaller can find other bugs faster.
Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <g.na...@alphalink.fr>
Acked-by: James Chapman <jchap...@katalix.com>

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in setup_udp_tunnel_sock+0x3ee/0x5f0 
net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.c:69
dst_release: dst:00000000d53d0d0f refcnt:-1
Write of size 1 at addr ffff8801d013b798 by task syz-executor3/6242

CPU: 1 PID: 6242 Comm: syz-executor3 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc2+ #253
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 
01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
 print_address_description+0x73/0x250 mm/kasan/report.c:256
 kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:354 [inline]
 kasan_report+0x23b/0x360 mm/kasan/report.c:412
 __asan_report_store1_noabort+0x17/0x20 mm/kasan/report.c:435
 setup_udp_tunnel_sock+0x3ee/0x5f0 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.c:69
 l2tp_tunnel_create+0x1354/0x17f0 net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c:1596
 pppol2tp_connect+0x14b1/0x1dd0 net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c:707
 SYSC_connect+0x213/0x4a0 net/socket.c:1640
 SyS_connect+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:1621
 do_syscall_64+0x280/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

Fixes: fd558d186df2 ("l2tp: Split pppol2tp patch into separate l2tp and ppp 
parts")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkal...@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
@@ -1612,9 +1612,14 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_create(struct net *net,
                encap = cfg->encap;
 
        /* Quick sanity checks */
+       err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+       if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM) {
+               pr_debug("tunl %hu: fd %d wrong socket type\n",
+                        tunnel_id, fd);
+               goto err;
+       }
        switch (encap) {
        case L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_UDP:
-               err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
                if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP) {
                        pr_err("tunl %hu: fd %d wrong protocol, got %d, 
expected %d\n",
                               tunnel_id, fd, sk->sk_protocol, IPPROTO_UDP);
@@ -1622,7 +1627,6 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_create(struct net *net,
                }
                break;
        case L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_IP:
-               err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
                if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_L2TP) {
                        pr_err("tunl %hu: fd %d wrong protocol, got %d, 
expected %d\n",
                               tunnel_id, fd, sk->sk_protocol, IPPROTO_L2TP);


Reply via email to