Ion Badulescu wrote: > > Do you know if only one specific chip revision exhibits this problem? It > would really help track down the problem. If I remember correctly, 82557 > doesn't have flow control at all, and 82558/9 have different > implementations -- one is proprietary (82558) and one is standard (82559). 82559 has this problem for sure. -Udo. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Andrey Savochkin
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Andrey Savochkin
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Ion Badulescu
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4 Andrey Savochkin
- Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.... Ion Badulescu
- Re: eepro100 driver update fo... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver update fo... Andrey Savochkin
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Ion Badulescu
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Ion Badulescu
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Josh Fryman
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Ion Badulescu
- Re: eepro100 driver updat... Udo A. Steinberg