> Alan, what's the approach you'd feel more comfortable with:
> - One ioctl that passes a pointer to a known structure in ifr.ifr_data as 
>   its argument.
> - Several ioctl's, one for each parameter, that pass only the specific 
>   parameter new value as the argument.
> 
> The former is good because it relies on a _single_ ioctl. However, every
> time you change the ioctl structure you may lose backward compatibility.

One ioctl with a set of subcommands seems to be quite common

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to