On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:10:55 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Actions also need to be considered when checking for matching triggers
> - triggers differing only by action should be allowed, but currently
> aren't because the matching check ignores the action and erroneously
> returns -EEXIST.

Hi Tom,

Could you show us the bad/good examples (maybe different onmatch() actions)?
And if it is real bugfix, I would like to add a ftracetest testcase for this 
fix.

Thank you,

> 
> Add and call an actions_match() function to address that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 50 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c 
> b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 468e43f..ae84470 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -4363,6 +4363,53 @@ static void print_onmatch_spec(struct seq_file *m,
>       seq_puts(m, ")");
>  }
>  
> +static bool actions_match(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> +                       struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data_test)
> +{
> +     unsigned int i, j;
> +
> +     if (hist_data->n_actions != hist_data_test->n_actions)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_actions; i++) {
> +             struct action_data *data = hist_data->actions[i];
> +             struct action_data *data_test = hist_data_test->actions[i];
> +
> +             if (data->fn != data_test->fn)
> +                     return false;
> +
> +             if (data->n_params != data_test->n_params)
> +                     return false;
> +
> +             for (j = 0; j < data->n_params; j++) {
> +                     if (strcmp(data->params[j], data_test->params[j]) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +             }
> +
> +             if (data->fn == action_trace) {
> +                     if (strcmp(data->onmatch.synth_event_name,
> +                                data_test->onmatch.synth_event_name) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +                     if (strcmp(data->onmatch.match_event_system,
> +                                data_test->onmatch.match_event_system) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +                     if (strcmp(data->onmatch.match_event,
> +                                data_test->onmatch.match_event) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +             } else if (data->fn == onmax_save) {
> +                     if (strcmp(data->onmax.var_str,
> +                                data_test->onmax.var_str) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +                     if (strcmp(data->onmax.fn_name,
> +                                data_test->onmax.fn_name) != 0)
> +                             return false;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
> +
>  static void print_actions_spec(struct seq_file *m,
>                              struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data)
>  {
> @@ -5173,6 +5220,9 @@ static bool hist_trigger_match(struct 
> event_trigger_data *data,
>           (strcmp(data->filter_str, data_test->filter_str) != 0))
>               return false;
>  
> +     if (!actions_match(hist_data, hist_data_test))
> +             return false;
> +
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to