On Tue 2018-04-03 10:12:37, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/02/18 17:15), Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, I have never seen the error code in this form. > > > > We have limited space to print it and error numbers currently can be up > > to 0xfff (4095). So, I have no better idea how to squeeze them while > > thinking that "(efault)" is much harder to parse in case of error > > 'efault' looks to me like a misspelled 'default', for some reason.
I wonder if (-efault) would help a bit. Even better might be (-EFAULT). But then it would be better to use (NULL). It already was but it was explicitly changed to the lowercase variant by the commit 0f4f81dce93774a447da3c ("vsprintf: factorize "(null)" string"). Best Regards, Petr