Hi Robin,

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/18 12:14, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> > From: Vadim Lomovtsev <vadim.lomovt...@cavium.com>
> > 
> > It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
> > allocate array for them by overall number of mac addresses from netdev.
> > 
> > This eventually removes multiple kmalloc() calls, aviod memory
> > fragmentation and allow to put single null check on kmalloc
> > return value in order to prevent a potential null pointer dereference.
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467429 ("Dereference null return value")
> > Fixes: 37c3347eb247 ("net: thunderx: add ndo_set_rx_mode callback 
> > implementation for VF")
> > Signed-off-by: Vadim Lomovtsev <vadim.lomovt...@cavium.com>
> > ---
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> >   - C99 syntax: update xcast_addr_list struct field mc[0] -> mc[];
> > 
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h        |  7 +-----
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 28 
> > +++++++++---------------
> >   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> > index 5fc46c5a4f36..448d1fafc827 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> > @@ -265,14 +265,9 @@ struct nicvf_drv_stats {
> >   struct cavium_ptp;
> > -struct xcast_addr {
> > -   struct list_head list;
> > -   u64              addr;
> > -};
> > -
> >   struct xcast_addr_list {
> > -   struct list_head list;
> >     int              count;
> > +   u64              mc[];
> >   };
> >   struct nicvf_work {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
> > index 1e9a31fef729..a26d8bc92e01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
> > @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static void nicvf_set_rx_mode_task(struct work_struct 
> > *work_arg)
> >                                               work.work);
> >     struct nicvf *nic = container_of(vf_work, struct nicvf, rx_mode_work);
> >     union nic_mbx mbx = {};
> > -   struct xcast_addr *xaddr, *next;
> > +   u8 idx = 0;
> >     if (!vf_work)
> >             return;
> > @@ -1956,16 +1956,10 @@ static void nicvf_set_rx_mode_task(struct 
> > work_struct *work_arg)
> >     /* check if we have any specific MACs to be added to PF DMAC filter */
> >     if (vf_work->mc) {
> >             /* now go through kernel list of MACs and add them one by one */
> > -           list_for_each_entry_safe(xaddr, next,
> > -                                    &vf_work->mc->list, list) {
> > +           for (idx = 0; idx < vf_work->mc->count; idx++) {
> >                     mbx.xcast.msg = NIC_MBOX_MSG_ADD_MCAST;
> > -                   mbx.xcast.data.mac = xaddr->addr;
> > +                   mbx.xcast.data.mac = vf_work->mc->mc[idx];
> >                     nicvf_send_msg_to_pf(nic, &mbx);
> > -
> > -                   /* after receiving ACK from PF release memory */
> > -                   list_del(&xaddr->list);
> > -                   kfree(xaddr);
> > -                   vf_work->mc->count--;
> >             }
> >             kfree(vf_work->mc);
> >     }
> > @@ -1996,17 +1990,15 @@ static void nicvf_set_rx_mode(struct net_device 
> > *netdev)
> >                     mode |= BGX_XCAST_MCAST_FILTER;
> >                     /* here we need to copy mc addrs */
> >                     if (netdev_mc_count(netdev)) {
> > -                           struct xcast_addr *xaddr;
> > -
> > -                           mc_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*mc_list), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -                           INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mc_list->list);
> > +                           mc_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*mc_list) +
> > +                                             sizeof(u64) * 
> > netdev_mc_count(netdev),
> 
> FWIW if you really wanted to disambiguate that it's a structure and not just
> an array being allocated, then it could be expressed without explicit
> arithmetic:
> 
>       size = offsetof(typeof(*mc_list), mc[netdev_mc_count(netdev)]);
> 
> but that's probably just a matter of personal preference at this point.
> 
> Robin.
> 

Thanks for reviewing it and for hint. From style perspective, I believe,
I should get rid off direct types names also, and use your suggestion here.

I'll update patch to v3, test and re-post.
Thank you for your time.

WBR,
Vadim

> > +                                             GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +                           if (unlikely(!mc_list))
> > +                                   return;
> > +                           mc_list->count = 0;
> >                             netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(ha, &netdev->mc) {
> > -                                   xaddr = kmalloc(sizeof(*xaddr),
> > -                                                   GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -                                   xaddr->addr =
> > +                                   mc_list->mc[mc_list->count] =
> >                                             ether_addr_to_u64(ha->addr);
> > -                                   list_add_tail(&xaddr->list,
> > -                                                 &mc_list->list);
> >                                     mc_list->count++;
> >                             }
> >                     }
> > 

Reply via email to