On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:08:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 00:03:48 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Turns out get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast return different
> > values on error when given a single page: __get_user_pages_fast returns
> > 0.  get_user_pages_fast returns either 0 or an error.
> > 
> > Callers of get_user_pages_fast expect an error so fix it up to return an
> > error consistently.
> > 
> > Stress the difference between get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast
> > to make sure callers aren't confused.
> > 
> 
> A term which is missing from all these changelogs is "vhost" :(

vhost has a BUG_ON for unexpected handling so it catches the bug, but
it's not the only site affected.

> This patchset fixes a user-affecting bug, does it not?  If so, please
> fully describe that bug so that we can decide which kernel version(s)
> need the patchset.

OK, I'll try to write up something.

> And yes, this return value asymmetry is sad.  Did you scope out what
> would be needed to fix up the callers so we can avoid this?

Yes - there is a very small number of callers for __get_user_pages_fast
so it's easy to teach them all to treat any value <=0 as 0.
There seems to be some opposition to changing the API,
I'd like to look into this after the bugfix patchset is merged.

-- 
MST

Reply via email to