On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:57:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:43:51AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> > On Jun 4 2007 10:27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> >> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> >>> Seconded. All my code contains the goto label in the first column.
>> >>>
>> >>> IMO any other goto label indentation is silly, because it obscures the
>> >>> goto label within the code block.
>> >> I would have to disagree with this. IMNSHO, a goto label is like a case
>> >> label, and they should be treated the same way.
>> >
>> > But gotos are special. ("Evil" minus the "it's good for unrolling in case
>> > of an
>> > error" case).
>> >
>>
>> So?
>>
>> You still want them to be associated with the level the bailout happens at.
>
>A matter of opinion :) I tend to think goto is special enough to
>warrant column 1 unconditionally. It is special, so it draws additional
>attention over and above case labels.
>
>I and others have been tripped up when programmers "hide" goto
>statements among regular statements.
>
>IMO goto warrants a big flashing "notice me" sign.
>
> Jeff
Hmmm, perhaps.
So, it seems that we can reach an agreement. Any other comments or suggestions?
Or can someone ack/merge this patch?
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
