pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.

The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
[1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()

pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK() 
in pci_epf_test_probe().
This function is not called in atomic context.

Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c 
b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
         * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
         * error in observed in the host system.
         */
-       mdelay(1);
+       usleep_range(1000, 2000);
 
        kfree(buf);
 
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to