On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:12:08AM -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote: > > @@ -4074,7 +4086,8 @@ static void cache_reap(struct work_struct *w) > > next_reap_node(); > > out: > > /* Set up the next iteration */ > > - schedule_delayed_work(work, round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC)); > > + schedule_delayed_work_on(reap_work->cpu, work, > > + round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC)); > > schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), work, > round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC)); > > instead all of the other changes?
Yeah, that'd make more sense. Thanks. -- tejun
