It was observed occasionally in PowerPC systems that there was reader
who had not been woken up but that its waiter->task had been cleared.

One probable cause of this missed wakeup may be the fact that the
waiter->task and the task state have not been properly synchronized as
the lock release-acquire pair of different locks in the wakeup code path
does not provide a full memory barrier guarantee. So smp_store_mb()
is now used to set waiter->task to NULL to provide a proper memory
barrier for synchronization.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index e795908..b3c588c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -209,6 +209,23 @@ static void __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
                smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);
        }
 
+       /*
+        * To avoid missed wakeup of reader, we need to make sure
+        * that task state and waiter->task are properly synchronized.
+        *
+        *     wakeup                 sleep
+        *     ------                 -----
+        * __rwsem_mark_wake:   rwsem_down_read_failed*:
+        *   [S] waiter->task     [S] set_current_state(state)
+        *       MB                   MB
+        * try_to_wake_up:
+        *   [L] state            [L] waiter->task
+        *
+        * For the wakeup path, the original lock release-acquire pair
+        * does not provide enough guarantee of proper synchronization.
+        */
+       smp_mb();
+
        adjustment = woken * RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS - adjustment;
        if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
                /* hit end of list above */
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to