4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>


[ Upstream commit 36cc2b9222b5106de34085c4dd8635ac67ef5cba ]

We don't set an error code here which means that perf_event_alloc()
returns ERR_PTR(0) (in other words NULL).  The callers are not expecting
that and would Oops.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Fixes: 375637bc5249 ("perf/core: Introduce address range filtering")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170522090418.hvs6icgpdo53wkn5@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/events/core.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9289,8 +9289,10 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
                event->addr_filters_offs = kcalloc(pmu->nr_addr_filters,
                                                   sizeof(unsigned long),
                                                   GFP_KERNEL);
-               if (!event->addr_filters_offs)
+               if (!event->addr_filters_offs) {
+                       err = -ENOMEM;
                        goto err_per_task;
+               }
 
                /* force hw sync on the address filters */
                event->addr_filters_gen = 1;


Reply via email to