On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:35:27 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote:


> [root@jouet ~]# perf test openat
>  2: Detect openat syscall event                           : Ok
>  3: Detect openat syscall event on all cpus               : Ok
> 15: syscalls:sys_enter_openat event fields                : Ok
> [root@jouet ~]#
> 
> [root@jouet ~]# perf trace -e nanosleep,syscalls:*nanosleep sleep 1
>      0.000 (         ): syscalls:sys_enter_nanosleep:rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950, 
> rmtp: 0x00000000
>      0.009 (         ): sleep/7905 nanosleep(rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950             
>                            ) ...
>   1000.204 (         ): syscalls:sys_exit_nanosleep:0x0
>      0.009 (1000.217 ms): sleep/7905  ... [continued]: nanosleep()) = 0
> [root@jouet ~]#
> 
> Works, so the regression seems to be fixed, without looking at the code
> that much:
> 
> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>

But does this still work on x86_32? I'll test that out. Thanks for
testing, but I may have another patch soon.

-- Steve

Reply via email to