4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

commit 1c196a6c771c47a2faa63d38d913e03284f73a16 upstream.

When a TIP packet is expected but there is a different packet, it is an
error. However the unexpected packet might be something important like a
TSC packet, so after the error, it is necessary to continue from there,
rather than the next packet. That is achieved by setting pkt_step to
zero.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1520431349-30689-4-git-send-email-adrian.hun...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -1616,6 +1616,7 @@ static int intel_pt_walk_fup_tip(struct
                case INTEL_PT_PWRX:
                        intel_pt_log("ERROR: Missing TIP after FUP\n");
                        decoder->pkt_state = INTEL_PT_STATE_ERR3;
+                       decoder->pkt_step = 0;
                        return -ENOENT;
 
                case INTEL_PT_OVF:


Reply via email to