On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:29:09 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:47AM +0000, Ahbong Chang wrote: > > It does not fail with any config without this fix. This is for new work. > > Then why not submit it as part of the "new work" patch series? That's > how dependancies are normally handled. I consider this patch making the kernel more robust. The reason I asked was to know if it should be marked for stable or not. If nothing currently relies on it, I just put it into the -rc as a "make the kernel a little more robust" change. If other code relies on it, I mark it for stable. I'll take this patch as more of a clean up. Thanks! -- Steve
