On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:57 PM, Arend van Spriel <aspr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Upon submitting a patch for mwifiex [1] it was discussed whether this > callback function could fail. To keep things simple there is no need > for the error code so the driver can do the task synchronous or not > without worries. Currently the device driver core already ignores the > return value so changing it to void. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10231933/ > > Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <aspr...@gmail.com> > --- > Hi Greg, > > Here is a resend of my patch that got lost. See if it makes it > this time ;-)
Hi Greg, Your patch-bot replied to this one and I may be overly anxious, but that's because things ran haywire in the initial submission. So is the patch in your queue for 4.17? Regards, Arend > Regards, > Arend > --- > include/linux/device.h | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)